Category talk:Ghostly items

Minimum Level errors

It looks like any items which can be of multiple levels are displaying as ML 1 instead of the actual ML of the lowest level of the item. Or better yet the actual ML of the lowest level of the item which can have the Ghostly property. The following items do not have a ML 1 version, and several of them do not get the Ghostly property until several versions above their actual ML version.

Item Type Enhancements ML Bind Quests

Ghost-Waking Cloak 1 Unbound

Ring of Shadows 1 Unbound

Ring of the Stalker 1 Unbound

Treads of Falling Shadow 1 Unbound

Whisperchain 1 Unbound

Is this just an artifact of using a template instead of having a hand-edited list which would be more accurate? -Niminae (Contribs • Message • Email) 02:14, May 7, 2017 (EDT)

They're showing up properly for me - when I sort by ML, the lowest-level item is the ML9 Cloak of Invisibility, followed by the L12 (then L13) Ghost-Waking Cloak. When I sort by item, it shows the G-WC at 12-14, 23-25; Ring of Shadows at 23-25; Ring of the Stalker at L20; Treads at 16-18, 23-25; and Whisperchain at 23-25. -LrdSlvrhnd (Contribs • Message • Email) 21:57, May 7, 2017 (EDT)

I forgot to reply here, but I fixed the issue here. Pages like Ghost-Waking Cloak were previously showing up in the list. — Zav (T·C) 01:10, May 8, 2017 (EDT)

• Thanks Zav. :) ShoeMaker (Contribs • Message • Email) 02:10, May 8, 2017 (EDT)

• Hand editing it would be less accurate (as it was before) because people update the item pages but don't know this exists and it's always way behind. Much better off pulling the information from the more updated item pages. :) Template can always be adapted as needed to fix little things like this. :) Our Discord chat server is probably the fastest way to get a response (use @DPL or @Advanced Templating to get specific help with these kinds of things). :) ShoeMaker (Contribs • Message • Email) 02:10, May 8, 2017 (EDT)
• No offense to Discord, but I'm not likely to ever use that application to discuss anything to do with this wiki. For one, unless you are there 24x7 there's no guarantee that I won't just be wasting my time launching that application instead of simply typing out my question or concern here, as I did above. And for two this conversation is able to be commented on by anyone who looks at this page. And finally, a discussion on Discord has no permanent record and is only known to the persons who took place in any given discussion. I frankly see the use of Discord as a means to subvert the participation of the vast majority of the wiki community in any Discord discussion regarding the wiki by limiting those discussions to a very few individuals and by not having any permanent record of those discussions. It is very poor form. But you're going to do you, Boo. -Niminae (Contribs • Message • Email) 06:09, May 9, 2017 (EDT)