Year of the Dragon: Through April 23rd, claim the adventure pack Slice of Life for free! Speak to Xatheral in the Hall of Heroes.
Game mechanics • Newbie guide • In development • DDO Store • Social Media
Challenges • Classes • Collectables • Crafting • Enhancements • Epic Destinies • Favor • Feats
Glossary • Items • Maps • Monsters • Places • Quests • Races • Reincarnation • Skills • Spells
Please create an account or log in to build a reputation and unlock more editing privileges, and then visit DDO wiki's IRC Chat/Discord if you need any help!
Talk:Intelligence
I personally think the page looks worse now than before the recent edit of Special:Contributions/Highlndr. I don't like the amount of bullets (too many levels, readability suffers). I don't think the first level bullets match the sub-bullets or the separation is logical (e.g. why is profane under "other" while alchemical is under "enchanted"..). I particularly detest moving the section Changes that influence the number of skill points gained to the bottom of the page - a new player looking for information will be long lost before reaching this important part.
Anyway, I do realize that some of the issues might be a personal preference thing, so whatever. I have fixed some omissions and errors in the article at least. Someone less emotionally attached to the previous format could perhaps look at this objectively. :)
--Cru121 (Contributions • Message) 15:47, March 17, 2013 (EDT)
- I'm not sure exactly what changed... I've looked at the history, and it looks like a couple words and a section was moved from the bottom to top... I do think the list depth is pushing the limit, but it is fine as it is as long as it gets no deeper. Also, I'm wondering if a table would look better.
ShoeMaker (Contributions • Message) 16:42, March 17, 2013 (EDT)
- I guess it is personal preference. I approved the edit because I thought it made it easier to read and because the Constitution page has the same structure. However, I would not be offended if it were changed back as I have no investment in the page at all.
- I guess it is personal preference. I approved the edit because I thought it made it easier to read and because the Constitution page has the same structure. However, I would not be offended if it were changed back as I have no investment in the page at all.
Susalona (Contributions • Message) 17:15, March 17, 2013 (EDT)